INTRODUCTIONTo evaluate the perceptions of the graduates of our medical school regarding the quality of their educational programme.

MATERIALS AND METHODSA total of 183 questionnaires, each containing 262 questions, were completed anonymously by medical students upon their graduation from the medical school.

RESULTSAbout 77% of the respondents felt that Basic Science courses lacked clinical relevance. Many of the students (61.2%) believed that physiology, amongst other Basic Science courses, was the most clinically relevant course. Assessment of the students about their clinical clerkship and internship rotations was not very favourable. Overall only 28.4% of the respondents were generally satisfied with the medical training they received. Respondents indicated many deficiencies in the curriculum, and in their competences. Exposure to numerous activities was rated by respondents as being inadequate: "geriatrics and gerontology education" (87.5%), "office management" (86.4%), "alternative medicine" (85.8%), "healthcare quality improvement" (85.7%), and "rehabilitation" (83%). Around 70% of the respondents reported that they have not been taught sufficient clinical skills in preparations for their future clinical practice. Only 33.3% of the respondents felt that they had acquired adequate knowledge and skills to start residency training.

CONCLUSIONSThis study illuminates many aspects of the curriculum the faculty needs to address in order to prepare physicians effectively and efficiently for clinical work. It can be used as a tool to find the trends in our curriculum and the impact of curriculum revision activities which are currently underway in our School of Medicine.