Comparison of open preperitoneal repair and Lichtenstein herniorraphy on the surgical treatment of inguinal hernia.

Ziwen Liu; Mengqing Sun; Liyang Zhang; Wenming WU; Weibin Wang; Xiaobin LI; Junyang LU; Yue Cao; Yupei Zhao

Return

Comparison of open preperitoneal repair and Lichtenstein herniorraphy on the surgical treatment of inguinal hernia.

Author: Ziwen LIU ¹ ; Mengqing SUN ¹ ; Liyang ZHANG ¹ ; Wenming WU ¹ ; Weibin WANG ¹ ; Xiaobin LI ¹ ; Junyang LU ¹ ; Yue CAO ¹ ; Yupei ZHAO ²
Author Information

1. Department of General Surgery, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Beijing 100073, China.
2. Department of General Surgery, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Beijing 100073, China. Email: zhao8028@263.net.
Publication Type:Journal Article
MeSH: Aged; Female; Hernia, Inguinal; surgery; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Operative Time; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Surgical Mesh
From: Chinese Journal of Surgery 2014;52(9):682-685
CountryChina
Language:Chinese
Abstract:
OBJECTIVESTo evaluate the safety and effectiveness of open preperitoneal herniorraphy comparing with traditional Lichtenstein tension-free herniorraphy on the surgical treatment of inguinal hernia.
METHODSThe clinical data of 249 patients with inguinal hernia admitted from October 2008 to December 2013 were reviewed retrospectively.Eighty-three patients received preperitoneal herniorraphy (preperitoneal group), there were 76 male and 7 female patients with a mean age of (70 ± 10) years.One hundred and seventy-three patients underwent Lichtenstein procedure (Lichtenstein group), there were 162 male and 11 femal patients with a mean age of (60 ± 16) years. The peri-operative performance, recurrence rate and postoperative morbidities of the patients underwent preperitoneal herniorraphy and traditional Lichtenstein herniorraphy were analyzed.
RESULTSThe operation time of the preperitoneal group (60 ± 11) minutes was significantly shorter than the Lichtenstein group (63 ± 8) minutes (t = -2.16, P = 0.032). The preperitoneal group showed significantly earlier out-of-bed activity ((6.2 ± 1.8) hours) than the Lichtenstein group ((15.0 ± 2.8) hours) (t = -13.2, P = 0.000). The visual analogue scale score on 24 hours postoperative was also lower in the preperitoneal group (4.0 ± 0.9) than in the Lichtenstein group (4.6 ± 1.4) (t = -4.11, P = 0.000). The two groups had no significant difference on the cost. There was one incision infection in preperitoneal group (1.20%).Four fat liquefaction (2.31%) and one patch rejection (0.58%) were found in Lichtenstein group. The incidence of complication of the two groups had no significant difference (P > 0.05). All the patients were followed up for 6 to 36 months, and there was no recurrence among all these patients.
CONCLUSIONSThere is no significant difference on the safety and effectiveness between preperitoneal herniorraphy and traditional Lichtenstein procedure on inguinal hernia.Open preperitoneal herniorraphy and can be applied for surgical treatment of recurrent or femoral hernia.