OBJECTIVETo investigate the benefit of surgical resection on the prognosis of patients with advanced gastric carcinoma and liver metastasis.

METHODSData of 102 cases of advanced gastric carcinoma with liver metastases from 1993 to 2004 were studied retrospectively.

RESULTSThe half-, one- and two-year postoperative survival rates of gastric carcinoma patients with H(1) metastasis undergone palliative resections were 69%, 44% and 6% respectively, which were significantly better than those of patients not undergone resection(accepted by-pass procedure or exploratory laparotomy) (P=0.009). The half-, one- and two-year postoperative survival rates of gastric carcinoma patients with H(2) metastasis undergone palliative resections were 56%,13% and 6% respectively, which were not significantly different compared with those of patients not undergone resection(P=0.068). The half-, one- and two-year postoperative survival rates of gastric carcinoma patients with H(3) metastasis undergone palliative resections were 25%, 13% and 0, which were not significantly different compared with those of cases not undergone resection (P=0.157). Regardless of peritoneal metastases, there were no significant differences between the survival rate of resection group and that of non-resection group.

CONCLUSIONSGastric carcinoma patients with H(1) metastasis would benefit from palliative resection regardless of peritoneal metastasis. Gastric carcinoma patients with H(2) or H(3) metastasis are not benefit from surgical resection.