Clinical application evaluation of Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer in Traditional Chinese Medicine.
10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20170710.004
- Author:
Nan-Nan SHI
1
;
Meng-Yu LIU
1
;
Yu-Qi LIU
1
;
Yue-Xi WANG
1
;
Li-Ying WANG
1
;
Ya YUWEN
1
;
Xue-Yao ZHAO
1
;
Dong-Feng WEI
1
;
Shuang KOU
1
;
Xue-Jie HAN
1
;
Yan-Ping WANG
1
Author Information
1. Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
application evaluation;
cancer;
traditional Chinese medicine guideline
- From:
China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica
2017;42(17):3247-3251
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
This study aims to evaluate the adaptability and applicability of Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer in Traditional Chinese Medicine. The assessment methods included adaptability assessment and applicability assessment. The adaptability assessment was based on the questionnaire survey to evaluate the familiarity, utilization, quality, and clinical application of the Guidelines; applicability assessment was based on the prospective observation of 853 clinical cases to investigate the applicability and effect of the Guidelines, including effectiveness, economy and safety. Statistical analysis for basic description, construction of different comparison groups for cross or hierarchical statistical test, multi-factor analysis, and confounding factors were used in the study. Adaptability assessment results showed that 63.03% of TCM doctors considered guidelines as good or very good applicability and 4.24% of TCM doctors considered guidelines with very poor applicability in clinical practice. For the applicability evaluation, TCM doctors considered that the "overall efficacy and technology level", "satisfactory degree" and "adaptability in clinical practice" of the guideline were 85.46%, 80.43% and 69.40% respectively. The results showed that guideline was well known among TCM doctors, especially junior TCM doctors. Adaptability and applicability of Guidelines were totally good but the quality and adaptability of the intervention schemes were still week, so the quality of Guidelines should be improved by revision.
