Comparison of REM Sleep-Dependent Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome with Sleep Stage Non-Dependent One in Women Patients.
- Author:
Taejoon PARK
;
Do Un JEONG
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Obstructive sleep apnea;
REM sleep;
REM sleep-dependent obstructive sleep apnea;
Nocturnal polysomnography;
Women
- MeSH:
Apnea;
Female;
Humans;
Male;
Mass Screening;
Polysomnography;
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive;
Sleep Stages;
Sleep, REM
- From:Sleep Medicine and Psychophysiology
2008;15(1):25-32
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: A few studies have compared REM sleep-dependent obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (REM-OSA) with sleep stage non-dependent apnea syndrome (SND-OSA). Despite that REM-OSA might be more common in women than men, no studies have examined the probable characteristics of women patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). This study aimed at finding out the characteristics of REM-OSA in women by comparing it with SND-OSA. METHODS: Fifty-three subjects diagnosed as OSAS (AHI>5; AHI: apnea-hypopnea index) with nocturnal polysomnography at the Center for Sleep and Chronobiology of the Seoul National University Hospital between October 2004 and February 2006 were studied. Of them, 44 subjects with OSAS severity of mild (52 and AHI-NR<15 (AHI-R: AHI during REM sleep, AHI-NR: AHI during non-REM sleep). We compared REM-OSA group with SND-OSA as well as the criteria-determined REM-OSA cases with the visually-determined ones. RESULTS: Among 44 subjects, 28 persons (63.6%) turned out to have REM-OSA by our criteria and 24 persons (54.5%) by visual determination. Statistically significant differences (p<0.05) were found between REM-OSA and SND-OSA groups in AHI, hypopnea index, total sleep time, total wake time, sleep efficiency index, percents of stage 1, 2 and REM sleep, and REM latency. Percent of stage REM sleep (%REM) turned out to have influence on AHI ratio (AHI-R/AHI-NR) (B=0.537, p=0.002). REM-OSA was likely to be diagnosed in milder severity of OSAS (chi-square=13.117, p<0.001) and those with higher %REM (chi-square=11.325, p=0.001). There was no significant difference between the criteria-determined and the visually-determined cases of REM-OSA. CONCLUSION: We suggest that REM-OSA and SND-OSA patients be differentiated in terms of pathophysiology and treatment strategies. Visual determination of REM-OSA might be useful as the screening procedure of REM-OSA. Further studies on women with OSAS and REM-OSA need to be done.
