Analysis Survey on Changes in Hospital Blood Donation Center and Satisfaction Level with the Korean Red Cross.
10.17945/kjbt.2015.26.2.142
- Author:
Gye Ryung CHOI
1
;
Hyun Ok KIM
;
Sinyoung KIM
;
Choong Hoon JANG
;
Young Sill CHOI
;
Jun Nyun KIM
Author Information
1. Seoul Nambu Blood Center, Korea Red Cross, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Korean Red Cross Center;
Blood service satisfaction;
Hospital blood donation center;
Blood Information Sharing System
- MeSH:
Blood Banks;
Blood Donors*;
Blood Transfusion;
Natural Resources;
Electronic Mail;
Emergencies;
Humans;
Korea;
Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques;
Red Cross*;
Tissue Donors
- From:Korean Journal of Blood Transfusion
2015;26(2):142-151
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Blood supply circumstances in Korea have changed in recent decades because of blood supplier diversification and restructuring of hospital blood donation centers. The purpose of this study is to understand the current status of hospital blood donation centers and their satisfaction levels with the Korean Red Cross Blood Center (KRCBC) and compare with the previous results for sustainable development of the blood supply system. METHODS: During one month in November 2014, we conducted a questionnaire survey through e-mail in 64 hospital blood donation centers which are approved by government. The response rate was 97% (62/64 hospitals). Responses from 62 hospitals were analyzed. RESULTS: The number of hospital blood donation centers were reduced by half from 129 in 2004 to 64 in 2014. There was no blood donation center in hospitals less than 400 beds, except 2 hospitals; 23 hospital (37.1%) blood banks collected no blood components. More than 80% of hospitals were satisfied with the KRCBC service such as donor record lookup and nucleic acid amplification Test (NAT) results lookup. Hospitals with more than 1,000 beds replied that they would not take account of transferring the collection services to KRCBC because of the directed and autologous donation and unexpected emergency blood transfusion. CONCLUSION: The government should be the subject of national blood policy and establish a committee or agency for its comprehensive and consistent execution through close cooperation with the KRCBC and hospitals.
