Study on preparation of laser micropore porcine acellular dermal matrix combined with split-thickness autograft and its application in wound transplantation.
- Author:
Li-Ming LIANG
1
;
Ji-Ke CHAI
;
Hong-Ming YANG
;
Rui FENG
;
Hui-Nan YIN
;
Feng-Yu LI
;
Qiang SUN
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Animals; Dermis; transplantation; Lasers; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Skin Transplantation; methods; Skin, Artificial; Swine; Transplantation, Heterologous
- From: Chinese Journal of Burns 2007;23(2):122-125
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo prepare a porcine acellular dermal matrix (PADM), and to optimize the interpore distance between PADM and co-grafted split-thickness autologous skin.
METHODSPorcine skin was treated with trypsin/Triton X-100 to prepare an acellular dermal matrix. Micropores were produced on the PADM with a laser punch. The distance between micropores varied as 0.8 mm, 1.0 mm, 1.2 mm and 1.5 mm. Full-thickness defect wounds were created on the back of 144 SD rats. The rats were randomly divided into 6 groups as follows, with 24 rats in each group. Micropore groups I -IV: the wounds were grafted with PADM with micropores in four different intervals respectively, and covered with split-thickness autologous skin graft. Mesh group: the wounds were grafted with meshed PADM and split-thickness autograft.
CONTROL GROUPwith simple split-thickness autografting. The gross observation of wound healing and histological observation were performed at 2, 4, 6 weeks after surgery. The wound healing rate and contraction rate were calculated.
RESULTSTwo and four weeks after surgery, the wound healing rate in micropore groups I and II was lower than that in control group (P < 0.05), but no obvious difference was between micropore groups I , II and mesh group (P > 0.05) until 6 weeks after grafting( P <0.05). The wound contraction rate in micropore groups I and II ([(16.0 +/- 2.6)%, (15.1 +/- 2.4)%] was remarkably lower than that in control group 4 and 6 weeks after grafting (P < 0.05), and it was significantly lower than that in mesh group [(19.3 +/- 2.4)%] 6 weeks after surgery (P <0.05). Histological examination showed good epithelization, regularly arranged collagenous fibers, and integral structure of basement membrane.
CONCLUSIONLaser micropore PADM (0.8 mm or 1.0 mm in distance) grafting in combination with split-thickness autografting can improve the quality of wound healing. PADM with laser micropores in 1.0 mm distance is the best choice among them.