Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses of Integrative Medicine in Chinese Need Regulation and Monitoring Urgently and Some Suggestions for Its Solutions.
10.1007/s11655-017-2427-7
- Author:
Jia-Ying WANG
1
;
Gui-Hua TIAN
2
;
You-Ping LI
3
;
Tai-Xiang WU
3
;
Zhao-Xiang BIAN
4
;
Liang DU
3
;
Hong-Cai SHANG
5
Author Information
1. Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Wuxi People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 214023, China.
2. Key Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education and Beijing City, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China.
3. the Chinese Cochrane Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
4. School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hongkong SAR, China.
5. Key Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education and Beijing City, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China. shanghongcai@126.com.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
integrative medicine;
regulation and monitoring;
systematic review in Chinese
- From:
Chinese journal of integrative medicine
2018;24(2):83-86
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
With the introduction and development of evidence-based medicine in China, it has been spread rapidly in the area of integrative medicine (IM) and has become a new unique discipline. During almost 20 years, as one of the most important parts of evidence-based IM, systematic review (SR)/meta-analysis (MA) of IM have shown a good development momentum in the aspects of quantity, depth, breadth and influence, but also face the harsh situation of the uncontrolled quantity and quality, especially for SRs in Chinese. Therefore, how to supervise and standardize this area effectively becomes a problem to be solved. Based on the experience both at home and abroad, the authors put forward several kinds of solutions for laying the foundation for further development such as promoting the registration system of SR/MA of IM, effectively setting up the regulatory platform of quality and quantity, launching professional training for SR/MA reviewers, forming qualification registration, developing the data transfer and sharing platform to realize the transparency of evidence process.
