A comparative study of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus pure laparoscopic major hepatectom.
- Author:
Haoming LIN
1
;
Guolin LI
;
Ruiming CHANG
;
Hai HE
;
Jun MIN
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Blood Loss, Surgical; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; surgery; Hepatectomy; methods; Humans; Laparoscopy; methods; Length of Stay; Liver Neoplasms; surgery; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
- From: Journal of Southern Medical University 2014;34(11):1676-1679
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo compare the outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic liver surgery (HALS) and pure laparoscopic liver surgery (PLS).
METHODSThe clinical data were analyzed for 64 patients undergoing major hepatectomy with HALH (23 cases) and PLS (41 cases) between January, 2010 and December, 2012.
RESULTSThe general data of the two groups were comparable. Compared with PLS, HALS was associated with a significantly shorter operative time (240 vs 191 min), less intraoperative blood loss (430 vs 220 ml, P<0.05), and a lower cost (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in postoperative hospital stay, complication rates or recurrence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma.
CONCLUSIONHALS is safe for major liver resection with such advantages over PLS as causing less trauma and a lower cost.
