Placement of an Implantable Port Catheter in the Biliary Stent: An Experimental Study in Dogs.
10.3348/jkrs.2004.50.4.237
- Author:
Gi Young KO
1
;
Im Sick LEE
;
Won Chan CHOI
Author Information
1. Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea. kogy@amc.seoul.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Animals;
Bile ducts, interventional procedure;
Stents and prostheses
- MeSH:
Abscess;
Animals;
Bile Ducts;
Constriction, Pathologic;
Dogs*;
Duodenum;
Follow-Up Studies;
Gallbladder;
Granulation Tissue;
Peritonitis;
Punctures;
Rupture;
Stents*;
Ultrasonography;
Urinary Bladder;
Vascular Access Devices*
- From:Journal of the Korean Radiological Society
2004;50(4):237-243
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of port catheter placement following a biliary stent placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We employed 14 mongrel dogs as test subject. and after the puncture of their gall bladders using sonographic guidance, a 10-mm in diameter metallic stent was placed at the common duct. In 12 dogs, a 6.3 F port catheter was placed into the duodenum through the common duct and a port was secured at the subcutaneous space following stent placement. As a control group, an 8.5 F drain tube was placed into the gallbladder without port catheter placement in the remaining two dogs. Irrigation of the bile duct was performed every week by injection of saline into the port, and the port catheter was replaced three weeks later in two dogs. Information relating to the success of the procedure, complications and the five-week follow-up cholangiographic findings were obtained. RESULTS: Placement of a biliary stent and a port catheter was technically successful in 13 (93%) dogs, while stent migration (n=3), gallbladder rupture (n=1) and death (n=5) due to subcutaneous abscess and peritonitis also occurred. The follow-up was achieved in eight dogs (seven dogs with a port catheter placement and one dog with a drain tube placement). Irrigation of the bile duct and port catheter replacement were successfully achieved without any complications. Cholangiograms obtained five weeks after stent placement showed diffuse biliary dilation with granulation tissue formation. However, focal biliary stricture was seen in one dog with stent placement alone. CONCLUSION: Placement of a port catheter following biliary stent placement seems to be feasible. However, further investigation is necessary to reduce the current complications.
