Clinical and microbiological features of community-acquired and nosocomial bloodstream infections in the surgical department of a tertiary-care hospital in Beijing.
- Author:
You LÜ
1
,
2
;
Peng GUO
;
Ying-Jiang YE
;
Hui WANG
;
Zhan-Long SHEN
;
Qi WANG
;
Chun-Jiang ZHAO
;
Zhi-Dong GAO
;
Xin ZHANG
;
Jian CAO
;
Ke-Wei JIANG
;
Shan WANG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; epidemiology; China; Community-Acquired Infections; epidemiology; microbiology; Cross Infection; epidemiology; microbiology; Cross-Sectional Studies; Escherichia coli; pathogenicity; Female; General Surgery; statistics & numerical data; Hospitals; Humans; Male; Staphylococcus; pathogenicity
- From: Chinese Medical Journal 2013;126(22):4242-4246
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUNDBloodstream infections (BSIs) remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgery. This study aimed at elucidating the clinical characteristics of community-acquired BSIs (CABs) and nosocomial BSIs (nBSIs) in patients admitted to the surgical wards of a teaching hospital in Beijing, China.
METHODSThis cross-sectional study compared 191 episodes of BSIs in 4074 patients admitted to the surgical wards between January 2008 and December 2011. Cases of BSIs were classified as CABs or nBSIs, and the characteristics, relevant treatments, and outcomes of CABs and nBSIs were compared.
RESULTSOf the 191 BSIs, 52 (27.2%) and 139 (72.8%) were CABs and nBSIs, respectively. Escherichia coli, coagulasenegative staphylococci, and Klebsiella spp, were the most frequently isolated microorganisms. There were significant differences between CABs and nBSIs with respect to the use of hormonal drugs, ventilation, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II and American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, and prevalence of cancer (P < 0.05). Empirical antibacterial therapy did not decrease the crude mortality, but multivariate analysis showed that high APACHE II was independently associated with a risk of mortality (odds ratio = 0.97, 95% confidence interval: 0.93-1.02 for APACHE II).
CONCLUSIONSWe found significant differences in the clinical characteristics of surgical patients with CABs and nBSIs. The outcome of patients seems to be related to high APACHE II scores.