Evaluation of effects of combination intervention model to men who have sex with men.
- Author:
Jing-guang TAN
1
;
Jin-quan CHENG
;
Zu-xun LU
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; prevention & control; Adult; HIV Infections; prevention & control; Health Education; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Homosexuality, Male; psychology; Humans; Male; Risk-Taking; Safe Sex; Sexual Behavior; Young Adult
- From: Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine 2012;46(8):732-735
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVEThis study aimed to explore and evaluate the effects of combination intervention model conducted by Center for Disease Control and Prevention and activity place to men who have sex with men (MSM).
METHODSTo implement one-year combination intervention in 4 MSM venues during May, 2009 and April, 2010. Meanwhile, 3 similar MSM venues were chosen as control. MSM places introduced CDC to consumption crowds. Experts and volunteers sent by CDC undertook health education programme on site and condom, lubricant, pamphlet, consultation, test were provided at the same time. The intervention measures applied to control only included providing pamphlet, condom, lubricant by volunteers. Investigations were conducted among subjects of combination intervention group and control group before (111, 120 subjects) and after (105, 98 subjects) the intervention with questions related to knowledge and behavior of AIDS prevention.
RESULTSAfter one-year intervention, among MSM with combination intervention, the awareness rate of knowledge level about acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) increased from 73.0% (81/111) to 91.7% (110/120), proportion of condom-use with male at last anal intercourse increased from 73.0% (81/111) to 85.0% (102/120), ratio of never-use condom with male decreased from 10.8% (11/102) to 1.7% (2/112), percentage of acquiring AIDS-related service and intervention improved significantly, acquiring condom (lubricant) increased from 70.3% (78/111) to 85.0% (102/120), acquiring peer education increased from 10.8% (12/111) to 24.2% (29/120), the proportion of acquiring counseling and testing of HIV increased from 69.4% (77/111) to 90.8% (109/120) (all P values < 0.05). The above index show no statistic difference before and after the intervention (all P values > 0.05) in control MSM venues.
CONCLUSIONCombination intervention model was an effective intervention model contributing to an increase in knowledge of AIDS prevention and decreasing high risk behavior in MSM population.