Clinical Analysis for 300 Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies.
- Author:
Chang Min JAE
1
;
Mun Sup SIM
;
Sang Eun MOON
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Pusan National University.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Gallstone;
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- MeSH:
Appendectomy;
Bile;
Busan;
Cholecystectomy;
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic*;
Dyspepsia;
Female;
Gallbladder Diseases;
Gallstones;
Hemorrhage;
Humans;
Inflammation;
Length of Stay;
Male;
Pain, Postoperative;
Patient Selection;
Polyps;
Punctures
- From:Journal of the Korean Surgical Society
1998;55(4):569-575
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
A cholecystectomy is one of the most frequent operations in the field of surgery. Recently, a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become a commonly performed procedure for treatment of gallbadder disease, mainly gallstone disease. It has the advantages of less postoperative pain, fewer complications, and more rapid recovery. There is no doubt that LC will be the first choice for the treatment of gallbladder disease. We performed this study to research problem and to improve the successbility of this operation. We analyzed 300 patients who underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy from January 1, 1993 to December 31, 1996, at the Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Pusan National University. The main results are as follows:1) The age range of the patients was from 17 to 72 years. There were 104 males and 196 females. 2) The most common previous operation was an appendectomy; the second most common was pelvic surgery. 3) The common chief complaints were right upper guadrant pain and indigestion. 4) Radiologic finding showed, gallstones in 212 cases and polyps in 30 cases. 5) The removed stones varied in size and number. 6) Postopertive complications were puncture site infection, bile leakage, pulmonary complications, etc. 7) The mean postopertive hospital stay was 4.2 days. 8) Intraoperative conversion to an open cholecystectomy was due to severe inflammation, adhesion, bleeding, etc. In conclusion, resolution of technical difficulties, meticulous training and experience, proper patient selection, and more developed tools are required.
