OBJECTIVETo compare clinical outcomes of perpendicular or parallel double plate in treating type C fractures of distal humerus in adults.

METHODSFrom March 2009 and March 2013, 40 adult patients with type C distal humerus fractures were treated. The patients were divided into two groups according to fixed form. In perpendicular group(group A), there were 13 males and 9 females with a mean age of (37.56±9.24) years old(ranged 18 to 56);while in parallel plating group(group B), including 11 males and 7 females, with a mean age of (41.35±9.03) year old(ranged 20 to 53). All fractures were fresh and closed without blood vessels or nerve damaged. Incision length, operating time, blood loss, hospital stay, preoperative and postoperative radiological change, range of activity of elbow joint, Mayo score, flexor and extensor elbow strength, and postoperative complications were observed and compared.

RESULTSAll incisions were healed well. One patient occurred myositis ossificans between two groups. Two patients in group A and 1 patient in group B occurred elbow joint stiffness. All fractures were obtained bone union. Group A were followed up from 20 to 36 months with an average of (25.2±7.1) months, while group B were followed up from 18 to 35 months with an average of(24.3±6.0) months. There were significant differences in blood loss and operative time, while there was no obvious meaning in incision length, hospital stay, muscle strength, fracture healing time, range of activity of elbow joint. Mayo score of group A was 82.27±10.43, 6 cases obtained excellent results, 12 good, 3 moderate and 1 poor;in group B was 81.94±12.02, 5 cases obtained excellent results, 9 good, 3 moderate and 1 poor;and there were no statistical significance between two groups.

CONCLUSIONSThere was no significant differences in clinical effects between perpendicular and parallel double plate for adult patients with type C distal humerus fractures, while the operation should choose according to facture and proficiency of operator.