Clinical observation of mesenchymal stem cell as salvage treatment for refractory acute graft-versus-host disease.
- Author:
Ke ZHAO
1
;
Fen HUANG
;
Yan-wen PENG
;
Hong-sheng ZHOU
;
Zhi-ping FAN
;
Xian ZHANG
;
Xu-tao GUO
;
Na XU
;
Jing SUN
;
Peng XIANG
;
Qi-fa LIU
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Adolescent; Adult; Female; Graft vs Host Disease; therapy; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; therapeutic use; Male; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation; Middle Aged; Salvage Therapy; Transplantation Conditioning; Transplantation, Homologous; Young Adult
- From: Chinese Journal of Hematology 2013;34(2):122-126
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo explore the effect of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) on refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) failed to second-line immunosuppressive therapy.
METHODSTwenty-two patients with refractory aGVHD received the treatment of first- and/or second-line immunosuppressive agents in combination with MSCs. The MSCs from bone marrow (BM) of HLA-unrelated third-party donors, were used at the median time of 19 (11 - 49) days after aGVHD onset, at a dose of 1×10(6)/kg once with an interval of 14 days. If the symptoms of aGVHD did not improve after continuous infusion four times, MSCs would be discontinued. Meanwhile the proportion of CD3(+)CD4(+), CD3(+)CD8(+) and CD4(+)CD25(+) was detected by flow cytometry (FCM) before and 4 weeks after the MSCs infusion.
RESULTSThe median dose of MSC was 4.8 (2.5 - 6.3)×10(6) cell×kg(-1) with a median infusion of 2.5 (1 - 7) times per case. Twelve patients achieved complete response (CR), four partial response (PR) after treatment. The total effective rate was 72.7% (16/22). With a median follow-up of 246.5 (36 - 1116) days post-transplantation, 11 patients survived and 11 died. The causes of death included GVHD(n = 6), infections (n = 3), leukemia relapse (n = 1) and post-transplant lymphoproliferative diseases (n = 1), respectively. The proportion of CD3(+)CD4(+)/CD3(+)CD8(+) was significantly higher at 4th week after MSCs infusion compared to before infusion (1.58 ± 0.54 vs 0.49 ± 0.19, \%t\% = 0.628, P = 0.04). The number of CD4(+)CD25(+) Treg cells had not changed much compared to before infusion (P = 0.606).
CONCLUSIONMSCs derived from the BM of a third-party donor are effective to treat aGVHD failed to second-line immunosuppressive therapy after allo-HSCT. MSCs might play a role in aGVHD by regulating the rate of CD3(+)CD4(+)/CD3(+)CD8(+).