CTL epitopes modified by KDEL and recognized by CD8+ T lymphocytes to herpes simplex virus type 2 improve CTL effect.
- Author:
Ping LUO
1
;
Xu-hu MAO
;
Li-li ZHAO
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Animals; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; immunology; Cell Line; Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte; immunology; Herpesvirus 2, Human; immunology; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Oligopeptides; immunology; Protein Sorting Signals; Random Allocation; T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic; immunology
- From: National Journal of Andrology 2005;11(4):252-255
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo study the improvement of CTL effect by CTL epitopes which are modified by KDEL and recognized by CD8+ T lymphocytes to herpes simplex virus type 2.
METHODSObservations were made on the specific immune response induced by the CD8+ CTL epitopes(SSIEFARL, S1), the CD8+ CTL epitopes modified by KDEL(SSIEFARL-KDEL, S1-KDEL), the tandem four copies CD8+ CTL epitopes[(SSIEFARL)4, S4] and the tandem four copies CD8+ CTL epitopes modified by KDEL[(SSIEFARL)4-KDEL, S4-KDEL], 25 male C57BL/6 mouse were randomly divided into 5 group, 5 mice per group, respectively immunized with istonic Na chloride, S1, S1-KDEL, S4 and S4-KDEL. Lymphocyte proliferation was detected by 3H-TdR and the CTL effect induced by CTL epitopes in vivo was detected by 51Cr.
RESULTSIn the 3H-TdR test, compared with the control, the group S1 and group S1-KDEL, the cpm values of Group S4 and Group S4-KDEL were markedly higher (P < 0.05) and the cpm value of Group S4-KDEL was significantly higher than Group S4 (P < 0.05), but the cpm values of Group S1 and Group S1-KDEL were not significantly different from the control (P > 0.05), nor was that of Group S1 from Group S1-KDEL (P > 0.05). In the experiment in which the EL4 cells sensitized by S1 were attacked as target cells, the CTL activities induced in Group S4 and Group S4-KDEL were markedly higher (P < 0.05) compared with the control, Group S1 and Group S1-KDEL, and that induced in Group S4-KDEL was significantly higher than Group S4 (P < 0.05), but the CTL activity induced in Group S1 and Group S1-KDEL were not significantly different from the control (P > 0.05), nor was that induced in Group S1 from Group S1-KDEL (P > 0.05). In the experiment in which the EL4 cells were attacked as target cells, the kill rate was below 10% in every group, not significantly different from the control.
CONCLUSIONThe tandem four copies CD8+ CTL epitopes, modified by KDEL and recognized by CD8+ T lymphocytes to herpes simplex virus type 2, can improve the CTL effect.