OBJECTIVETo compare the clinical effects of three methods of internal fixations in treating intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients.

METHODSFrom 2004 to 2008, the clinical data of 112 patients with intertrochanteric fractures were retrospectively analyzed. There were 63 males and 49 females, aged from 60 to 80 years with an average of 66.2 years. The patients were treated respectively with dynamic hip screws (DHS group, 40 cases), anatomic plate (anatomic plate group, 36 cases) and proximal femoral intramedullary nails (PFN group, 36 cases). The data of each group were collected for statistical analysis on the following aspects: operative time, blood loss volume, clinical healing time of fracture, postoperative complications, and hip functional score of Harris.

RESULTSAll these patients were followed up from 20 to 24 months with an average of 22.6 months. There was no significant difference in operative time, blood loss volume among three groups; there was significant difference in clinical healing time of fracture, Harris score and postoperative complications among three groups (P < 0.05). In the healing time, the PFN group was significantly less than that of other groups (P = 0.001), but there was no differences between DHS group and anatomic plate group. In the Harris score, the PFN group was significantly higher than that of other groups (P = 0.001), but there was no differences between DHS group and anatomic plate group. In the aspect of postoperation complication, there was 2 cases of coxa vara, 1 case of internal fixation loosening and 1 case of deep venous thrombosis in the DHS group; there were 2 cases of deep venous thrombosis in the PFN group; there were 2 cases of coxa vara and 1 case of internal fixation loosening in the anatomic plate group (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONIn the treatment of intertronchanteric fractures, proximal femoral intramedullary nail may be the best choice, which can decrease healing time as well as complications postoperatively.