Meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of self-expending metallic stents as bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction.
- Author:
Ri-sheng ZHAO
1
;
Hui WANG
;
Lei WANG
;
Mei-jin HUANG
;
Dian-ke CHEN
;
Jian-ping WANG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Colectomy; Colorectal Neoplasms; complications; surgery; Emergencies; Humans; Intestinal Obstruction; etiology; surgery; Stents; Treatment Outcome
- From: Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2012;15(7):697-701
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the safety and efficacy of self-expending metallic stents (SEMS) as bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction.
METHODSA comprehensive literature search of CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Ovid LWW, CMB, CNKI and Wanfang Databases were performed for all randomized controlled trials or retrospective studies comparing self-expending metallic stents as bridge to surgery(SABS group) with emergency surgery (ES group). A meta-analysis was carried out by RevMan5.1 software on the outcomes concerning safety and efficacy of the two groups.
RESULTSFourteen studies matched the criteria including 1083 patients. Five were randomized controlled trials and nine were retrospective analysis. Compared with the ES group, the SABS group had a lower short-term mortality(RR=0.52, 95% CI:0.30-0.93, P<0.05), lower overall complications(RR=0.46, 95% CI:0.31-0.70, P<0.05), higher resection rate(RR=1.90, 95%CI:1.33-2.70, P<0.01), shorter operative time(MD=-59.77, 95%CI:-87.51--32.04, P<0.01), and shorter interval to first flatus(MD=-10.78, 95%CI:-16.67--4.90, P<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in permanent stomy and hospital stay.
CONCLUSIONThe safety and efficacy of self-expending metallic stents as bridge to surgery for left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction is superior to emergency surgery.
