Comparison of Predictive Factors for Postoperative Incontinence of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate by the Surgeons' Experience During Learning Curve.
- Author:
Katsumi SHIGEMURA
1
;
Kazushi TANAKA
;
Fukashi YAMAMICHI
;
Koji CHIBA
;
Masato FUJISAWA
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Urinary Incontinence; Holmium-YAG Lasers; Transurethral Resection of Prostate; Learning curve; Urodynamics
- MeSH: Catheters; Holmium*; Humans; Lasers, Solid-State*; Learning Curve*; Learning*; Mentors; Multivariate Analysis; Odds Ratio; Prostate*; Quality of Life; Transurethral Resection of Prostate; Urinary Incontinence; Urodynamics
- From:International Neurourology Journal 2016;20(1):59-68
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: To detect predictive factors for postoperative incontinence following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) according to surgeon experience (beginner or experienced) and preoperative clinical data. METHODS: Of 224 patients, a total of 203 with available data on incontinence were investigated. The potential predictive factors for post-HoLEP incontinence included clinical factors, such as patient age, and preoperative urodynamic study results, including detrusor overactivity (DO). We also classified the surgeons performing the procedure according to their HoLEP experience: beginner (<21 cases) and experienced (≥21 cases). RESULTS: Our statistical data showed DO was a significant predictive factor at the super-short period (the next day of catheter removal: odds ratio [OR], 3.375; P=0.000). Additionally, patient age, surgeon mentorship (inverse correlation), and prostate volume were significant predictive factors at the 1-month interval after HoLEP (OR, 1.072; P=0.004; OR, 0.251; P=0.002; and OR, 1.008; P=0.049, respectively). With regards to surgeon experience, DO and preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (inverse) at the super-short period, and patient age and mentorship (inverse correlation) at the 1-month interval after HoLEP (OR, 3.952; P=0.002; OR, 1.084; P=0.015; and OR,1.084; P=0.015; OR, 0.358; P=0.003, respectively) were significant predictive factors for beginners, and first desire to void (FDV) at 1 month after HoLEP (OR, 1.009; P=0.012) was a significant predictive factor for experienced surgeons in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative DO, IPSS, patient age, and surgeon mentorship were significant predictive factors of postoperative patient incontinence for beginner surgeons, while FDV was a significant predictive factors for experienced surgeons. These findings should be taken into account by surgeons performing HoLEP to maximize the patient's quality of life with regards to urinary continence.
