Comparisons of efficacy of different pulmonary surfactants for the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.
- Author:
Yun LIU
1
;
Li LI
;
Wen-Ying LIANG
;
Chun-Xia NIE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Animals; Blood Gas Analysis; Cattle; Female; Hospitalization; economics; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Length of Stay; Male; Pulmonary Surfactants; therapeutic use; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn; complications; drug therapy; Swine
- From: Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics 2012;14(4):253-255
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo compare the clinical efficacy of imported pulmonary surfactant (PS) pig lung phospholipids injection (pig PS) and domestic cattle lung surface-active agent (cattle PS) for the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS).
METHODSA total of 180 cases of grade IV NRDS receiving pig PS (n=90) or cattle PS treatment (n=90) were enrolled. The blood gas analysis and chest X-ray results and the incidence of complications after treatment, and hospitalization time and cost were compared between the two treatment groups.
RESULTSThe efficiency rate in the pig PS group (97%) was higher than in the catle PS group (83%) (P<0.01). The cure rate in the pig PS group was also higher than in the cattle PS group (84% vs 66%; P<0.01). The incidence of pneumothorax in the pig PS group was lower than in the cattle PS group (3% vs 7%; P<0.05). The hospitalization time in the pig PS group was shorter than in the cattle PS group (21 ± 4 days vs 23 ± 4 days; P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the total hospitalization cost between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONSPig PS seems to be superior to cattle PS in the treatment of grade IV NRDS.