Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for accidental papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: comparison with conventional open thyroidectomy with 5 years follow-up.
- Author:
Jian-Zhong DI
1
;
Hong-Wei ZHANG
;
Xiao-Dong HAN
;
Pin ZHANG
;
Qi ZHENG
;
Yu WANG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Adult; Carcinoma; Carcinoma, Papillary; Female; Humans; Male; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; adverse effects; methods; Postoperative Complications; Thyroid Neoplasms; surgery; Thyroidectomy; adverse effects; methods; Treatment Outcome; Video-Assisted Surgery; methods
- From: Chinese Medical Journal 2011;124(20):3293-3296
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUNDMinimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) has received increasing attention for malignant thyroid diseases. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of MIVAT with conventional open thyroidectomy (CT) for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC).
METHODSThirty-one patients were treated with MIVAT and 37 with CT. Their pathological characteristics, surgical complications, 5-year postoperative thyroglobulin (TG) and ultrasonic results were followed up.
RESULTSAll the patients took levothyroxine for suppressing thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) after surgery, and were followed up with measurement of serum TG and neck ultrasonography at intervals of 6 or 12 months. There was no statistically significant difference between the CT and MIVAT groups for sex ratio, operation time, positive lymph nodes, complications and prognosis, but the MIVAT group had better cosmetic results.
CONCLUSIONSMIVAT did not differ significantly from CT for PTMC after 5 years follow-up, but it did have better cosmetic results. MIVAT is a safe and valid surgical technique for selected cases.
