Effects of implant tilting and the loading direction on the displacement and micromotion of immediately loaded implants: an in vitro experiment and finite element analysis.
10.5051/jpis.2017.47.4.251
- Author:
Tsutomu SUGIURA
1
;
Kazuhiko YAMAMOTO
;
Satoshi HORITA
;
Kazuhiro MURAKAMI
;
Sadami TSUTSUMI
;
Tadaaki KIRITA
Author Information
1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan. sugiurat@naramed-u.ac.jp
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Dental implants;
Finite element analysis;
Immediate dental implant loading
- MeSH:
Dental Implants;
Finite Element Analysis*;
Immediate Dental Implant Loading;
In Vitro Techniques*
- From:Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science
2017;47(4):251-262
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of implant tilting and the loading direction on the displacement and micromotion (relative displacement between the implant and bone) of immediately loaded implants by in vitro experiments and finite element analysis (FEA). METHODS: Six artificial bone blocks were prepared. Six screw-type implants with a length of 10 mm and diameter of 4.3 mm were placed, with 3 positioned axially and 3 tilted. The tilted implants were 30° distally inclined to the axial implants. Vertical and mesiodistal oblique (45° angle) loads of 200 N were applied to the top of the abutment, and the abutment displacement was recorded. Nonlinear finite element models simulating the in vitro experiment were constructed, and the abutment displacement and micromotion were calculated. The data on the abutment displacement from in vitro experiments and FEA were compared, and the validity of the finite element model was evaluated. RESULTS: The abutment displacement was greater under oblique loading than under axial loading and greater for the tilted implants than for the axial implants. The in vitro and FEA results showed satisfactory consistency. The maximum micromotion was 2.8- to 4.1-fold higher under oblique loading than under vertical loading. The maximum micromotion values in the axial and tilted implants were very close under vertical loading. However, in the tilted implant model, the maximum micromotion was 38.7% less than in the axial implant model under oblique loading. The relationship between abutment displacement and micromotion varied according to the loading direction (vertical or oblique) as well as the implant insertion angle (axial or tilted). CONCLUSIONS: Tilted implants may have a lower maximum extent of micromotion than axial implants under mesiodistal oblique loading. The maximum micromotion values were strongly influenced by the loading direction. The maximum micromotion values did not reflect the abutment displacement values.
