Application of three-stitch preventive transverse colostomy in anterior resection of low rectal cancer.
- Author:
Yuzhou ZHAO
;
Guangsen HAN
1
;
Mingke HUO
;
Li WEI
;
Qiyun ZOU
;
Yuji ZHANG
;
Jian LI
;
Yanhui GU
;
Yanghui CAO
;
Shijia ZHANG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Colostomy; adverse effects; methods; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Humans; Operative Time; Postoperative Complications; epidemiology; Prospective Studies; Rectal Neoplasms; surgery; Surgical Stomas; adverse effects; Suture Techniques; adverse effects; instrumentation; Sutures; Treatment Outcome
- From: Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2017;20(4):439-442
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo explore the application of three-stitch preventive transverse colostomy in anterior resection of low rectal cancer.
METHODFrom May 2015 to March 2016, 70 consecutive low rectal cancer patients undergoing anterior resection and preventive transverse colostomy in our department were recruited in this prospective study. According to the random number table method, 70 patients were divided into three-stitch transverse colostomy group(observation group, n=35) and traditional transverse colostomy group(control group, n=35). Procedure of three-stitch preventive transverse colostomy was as follows: firstly, at the upper 1/3 incision 0.5-1.0 cm distance from the skin, 7# silk was used to suture from outside to inside, then the needle belt line went through the transverse edge of the mesangial avascular zone. At the lower 1/3 incision 0.5-1.0 cm distance from the skin, 7# silk was used to suture from inside to outside, then silk went through the transverse edge of the mesangial avascular zone again and was ligatured. Finally, in the upper and lower ends of the stoma, 7# silk was used to suture and fix transverse seromuscular layer and the skin. The operation time and morbidity of postoperative complications associated with colostomy were compared between two groups.
RESULTSThere were no significant differences in baseline data between the two groups(all P>0.05). The operative time of observation group was shorter than that of control group [(3.2±1.3) min vs. (15.5±3.4) min, P<0.05]. Incidences of colostomy skin-mucous separation, dermatitis, stoma rebound were significantly lower in observation group [5.7%(2/35) vs. 34.3%(12/35), P=0.007; 8.6%(3/35) vs. 31.4%(11/35), P=0.036; 0 vs. 17.1%(6/35), P=0.025, respectively], while incidences of parastomal hernia and stoma prolapse in two groups were similar (both P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONCompared with traditional transverse colostomy method, the three-stitch preventive transverse colostomy has more operating advantages and can reduce postoperative complications associated with colostomy.