Impact of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio on the prognosis of patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer.
- Author:
Huihong JIANG
1
;
Hui WANG
2
;
Ajian LI
2
;
Erjiang TANG
2
;
Ying CHEN
2
;
Aili WANG
2
;
Xiaxing DENG
1
;
Moubin LIN
3
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biomarkers; blood; China; Colonic Neoplasms; blood; mortality; Colorectal Neoplasms; blood; mortality; Female; Humans; Lymphocytes; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Neutrophils; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; ROC Curve; Rectal Neoplasms; blood; mortality; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Survival Rate
- From: Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2017;20(5):550-554
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo investigate the impact of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(NLR) on the prognosis of patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer (LACRC).
METHODSClinicopathological data of 684 patients with stage II(-III( CRC undergoing radical resection at Shanghai Ruijin Hospital from January 2008 to December 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. NLR was calculated from neutrophil and lymphocyte counts on routine blood tests prior to surgery. The optimal cutoff value of NLR for predicting 5-year overall survival (OS) was determined through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. According to the cut-off value, patients were divided into high NLR and low NLR groups. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis were compared between two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate the impact of clinical factors on prognosis.
RESULTSA total of 396 male and 288 female patients were included in the study, with a median age of 62 years(range 21-92).Among these patients, 335 had rectal cancers and 349 had colonic cancers; 328 were TNM stage II( and 356 were stage III(. The end of follow-up was January 2016. ROC curve showed that the optimal cut-off value of NLR was 3.0, then patients were divided into low NLR group (NLR≤3.0, n=481) and high NLR group (NLR>3.0, n=203). Compared with low NLR group, the high NLR group was more likely to be older (median 64 vs. 61, t=-2.412, P=0.016), presented higher ratio of colonic cancer [66.0%(134/203) vs. 44.7%(215/481), χ=25.945, P=0.000] and stage III( tumor [60.1%(122/203) vs. 48.6%(234/481), χ=7.499, P=0.007], but lower ratio of first-degree relative cancer history [8.9%(18/203) vs. 15.6%(75/481); χ=5.496, P=0.020]. However, no significant differences were observed between two groups in gender, smoking and drinking history, tumor differentiation grade, vessel invasion and nerve invasion (all P>0.05). The median follow-up time was 67 months (range 3-92), and the 5-year OS rates of high NLR and low NLR group were 59.6% and 73.2% respectively, with significant difference (P=0.001). Cox multivariate analysis revealed that age >65 years (HR=2.07, 95%CI=1.59-2.70, P=0.000), no first-degree relative cancer history (HR=2.01, 95%CI=1.23-3.28, P=0.005), poor differentiation grade (HR=1.65, 95%CI=1.26-2.15, P=0.000), positive vessel or nerve invasion (HR=1.92, 95%CI=1.35-2.71, P=0.000), high TNM stage(HR=2.10, 95%CI=1.59-2.77, P=0.000) and preoperative NLR>3.0(HR=1.51, 95%CI=1.14-2.00, P=0.004) were independent risk factors of prognosis for patients with LACRC.
CONCLUSIONSPreoperative NLR can influence the prognosis of patients with LACRC receiving radical surgery. High NLR is associated with poor prognosis.