Evaluating peptide mass fingerprinting-based protein identification.
10.1016/S1672-0229(08)60002-9
- Author:
Senthilkumar DAMODARAN
1
;
Troy D WOOD
;
Priyadharsini NAGARAJAN
;
Richard A RABIN
Author Information
1. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA. sd33@buffalo.edu
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Algorithms;
Peptide Mapping;
methods;
statistics & numerical data;
Proteomics;
methods;
statistics & numerical data;
Tandem Mass Spectrometry
- From:
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
2007;5(3-4):152-157
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Identification of proteins by mass spectrometry (MS) is an essential step in proteomic studies and is typically accomplished by either peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF) or amino acid sequencing of the peptide. Although sequence information from MS/MS analysis can be used to validate PMF-based protein identification, it may not be practical when analyzing a large number of proteins and when high- throughput MS/MS instrumentation is not readily available. At present, a vast majority of proteomic studies employ PMF. However, there are huge disparities in criteria used to identify proteins using PMF. Therefore, to reduce incorrect protein identification using PMF, and also to increase confidence in PMF-based protein identification without accompanying MS/MS analysis, definitive guiding principles are essential. To this end, we propose a value-based scoring system that provides guidance on evaluating when PMF-based protein identification can be deemed sufficient without accompanying amino acid sequence data from MS/MS analysis.
