The Dose-response of Intrathecal Ropivacaine Co-administered with Sufentanil for Cesarean Delivery under Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia in Patients with Scarred Uterus.
- Author:
Fei XIAO
;
Wen-Ping XU
;
Yin-Fa ZHANG
;
Lin LIU
;
Xia LIU
;
Li-Zhong WANG
1
;
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Adult; Amides; administration & dosage; therapeutic use; Anesthesia, Epidural; methods; Anesthesia, Spinal; methods; Cesarean Section; methods; Cicatrix; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Sufentanil; administration & dosage; therapeutic use; Uterus; pathology
- From: Chinese Medical Journal 2015;128(19):2577-2582
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUNDSpinal anesthesia is considered as a reasonable anesthetic option in lower abdominal and lower limb surgery. This study was to determine the dose-response of intrathecal ropivacaine in patients with scarred uterus undergoing cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.
METHODSSeventy-five patients with scarred uterus undergoing elective cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were enrolled in this randomized, double-blinded, dose-ranging study. Patients received 6, 8, 10, 12, or 14 mg intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine with 5 μg sufentanil. Successful spinal anesthesia was defined as a T4sensory level achieved with no need for epidural supplementation. The 50% effective dose (ED50) and 95% effective dose (ED95) were calculated with a logistic regression model.
RESULTSED50and ED95of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine for patients with scarred uterus undergoing cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) were 8.28 mg (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.28-9.83 mg) and 12.24 mg (95% CI: 10.53-21.88 mg), respectively.
CONCLUSIONWhen a CSEA technique is to use in patients with scarred uterus for an elective cesarean delivery, the ED50and ED95of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine along with 5 μg sufentanil were 8.28 mg and 12.24 mg, respectively. In addition, this local anesthetic is unsuitable for emergent cesarean delivery, but it has advantages for ambulatory patients.
