Clinical Experiences of the Arterial Bypass in Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease.
- Author:
Ick Hee KIM
1
;
Dong Ik KIM
;
Se Ho HUH
;
Byung Bung LEE
;
Duk Kyung KIM
;
Young Soo DO
;
Sun Jung LEE
Author Information
1. Division of Vascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Aortoiliac;
Axillofemoral;
Aortofemoral;
Bypass
- MeSH:
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Ischemia;
Limb Salvage;
Lower Extremity;
Retrospective Studies;
Risk Factors;
Transplants
- From:Journal of the Korean Surgical Society
2001;61(6):600-603
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To analysis of the clinical aspects of axillofemoral (AXFBG) and aortofemoral bypass (AOFBG) for aortoiliac occlusive disease. METHODS: Between June 1996 and May 2001, 23 patients underwent AXFBG or AOFBG for lower extremity ischemia caused by aortoiliac occlusive disease at Samsung Medical Center. The decision to perform AXFBG or AOFBG was based on an assessment of surgical risk and the patient's preference. We retrospectively analyzed the preoperative clinical status, risk factors and distal runoff scores affecting the patency rate as well as the clinical outcome following surgery. RESULTS: We performed 10 AXFBGs and 13 AOFBGs. The mean age was 67.8 years in AXFBG patients and 57.4 years in AOFBG patients. Limb salvage as an indication for surgery included 8 (80%) cases with AXFBG, as compared to 13(100%) cases with AOFBG. The mean follow-up period was 20.7 months in AXFBG and 21.8 months in AOFBG. The clinical improvement following surgery was statistically higher with AOFBG. The one-year and 2-year primary patency rates in AXFBG were 100% and 82% retrospectively. All of the grafts of AOFBG were patent during this follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The clinical improvement was higher with AOFBG as compared to AXFBG. However AXFBG is a safe practice in high-risk patients.
