Adjunctive therapy of xuezhikang capsule for coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
- Author:
Yang WANG
;
Zhi-hui CHEN
;
Guang-hui LIU
;
Fan ZHANG
;
Zhe ZHANG
;
Xue-feng GUAN
;
Zhi-bo LUO
;
Guan-lin YANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Angina Pectoris; Cardiovascular Diseases; Combined Modality Therapy; Confidence Intervals; Coronary Disease; drug therapy; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; therapeutic use; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- From: Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine 2014;34(10):1182-1191
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo systematically evaluate the effect and safety of Xuezhikang Capsule (XZKC) for adjuvant treatment for coronary heart disease (CHD) patients accompanied with or without dyslipidemia.
METHODSChina National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) Database, Chongqing VIP Database (VIP), Wanfang Data base, Cochrane Library, and Medline (PubMed) were retrieved with the deadline of August 30, 2013. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) of XZKC in treating CHD patients with or without dyslipidemia were all included. Assessment of bias risk for included studies was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention (Version 5.0.2): Criteria for judging risk of bias in the "risk of bias" assessment tool. Review Management (5.1.0) was employed for data statistics. If there was no significant heterogeneity, results from the random-effect model were presented. If the heterogeneity was not substantial, a meta-analysis was not performed and a narrative and qualitative summary was performed instead.
RESULTSA total of 28 RCTs (6,949 patients) were included after screening results. The methodological quality of included trial was generally lower. Results of Metaanalysis showed that XZKC was beneficial for CHD patients in decreasing cardiovascular events: when compared with the basic treatment group, the relative risk (RR) was 0.53 and 95% confidence interval (CI) was [0.35, 0.81]; when compared with the placebo + basic treatment group, RR was 0.52 and 95% CI was [0.42, 0.65]; when compared with the basic treatment group, RR for improving symptoms of angina was 1.20 and 95% CI was [1. 12, 1.30]; when compared with the basic treatment group, RR for improving abnormal ECG was 1.38 and 95% CI was [1.21, 1.57]. Thirteen studies showed that XZKC + basic treatment was obviously superior in lowering total cholesterol (TC) to that of the basic treatment group. Three studies showed that XZKC + basic treatment was obviously superior in lowering total cholesterol (TC) to that of the placebo + basic treatment group. Thirteen studies showed that XZKC + basic treatment was obviously superior in lowering low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to that of the basic treatment group. Three studies showed that XZKC + basic treatment was obviously superior in lowering LDL-C to that of the placebo + basic treatment group. A total of 18 studies describing adverse reactions (ADs) involved 61 ADs in the XZKC + basic treatment group. All suffered from mild symptoms or were improved after treatment. No severe ADs occurred.
CONCLUSIONTreatment of CHD by XZKC might lower the occurrence of cardiovascular events in CHD patients accompanied with or without dyslipidemia, relieve clinical symptoms, improve ECG, lower blood lipid levels, and with less adverse reactions.