Thinking about vertigo effectiveness evaluation methods in clinical research of Chinese medicine.
- Author:
Hong-mei LIU
;
Tao LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
China;
Dizziness;
diagnosis;
Humans;
Quality of Life;
Surveys and Questionnaires;
Vertigo;
diagnosis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine
2014;34(10):1256-1259
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Vertigo is a kind of patients' subjective feelings. The severity of vertigo is closely related to many factors. But we are short of a well accepted quantitative evaluation method capable of accurately and comprehensively evaluating vertigo in clinics. Reducing the onset of vertigo, enhancing the re- covery of equilibrium function, and improving the quality of life of vertigo patients should be taken as the focus of evaluating therapeutic effects. As for establishing a Chinese medical effectiveness evaluation system for vertigo, we believe we should distinguish different "diseases". We could roughly identify it as systemic vertigo and non-systemic vertigo. For systemic vertigo, the efficacy of vertigo could be comprehensively evaluated by UCLA vertigo questionnaire or dizziness handicap inventory combined with equilibrium function testing indices. But for non-systemic vertigo, the efficacy of vertigo could be comprehensively evaluated by taking UCLA vertigo questionnaire or dizziness handicap inventory as main efficacy indices. Secondly, we should analyze different reasons for vertigo, choose symptoms and signs in line with vertigo features as well as with Chinese medical theories, and formulate corresponding syndrome effectiveness standards according to different diseases. We should not simply take syndrome diagnosis standards as efficacy evaluation standards.
