OBJECTIVETo investigate the quality of reports of clinical results concerning burn injury, in order to raise the standard of clinical study of burn care in accordance to the standard of evidence-based medicine (EBM), with the aim of improving clinical research in burn care of this country.

METHODSAll the papers of clinical study published in Chinese Journal of Burns (CJB) from 2000 to 2004 were evaluated according to EBM standard.

RESULTSThere were 89 papers about clinical trials published in the past 5 years, in which 43 (48.3%) of the studies were carried out with random control trials (RCT), and 46 (51.7%) were clinical control trials (CCT). RCT papers increased year by year, while the number of CCT papers fluctuated greatly. The disparity in the quality of research was found as follows. In all the RCT and CCT papers, blinded research was adopted only in 5 papers (5.6%). Strict diagnostic standard including inclusion and exclusion standards were reported in 53 articles (59.6%). The comparison with baselines was not provided in 64 articles (71.9%). P value was given in 10 papers but statistical method was not mentioned (11.2%). Follow-up visits and lost information were only recorded in 2 articles, but no detailed follow-up visiting data were provided. Side effects were reported in 10 articles (11.2%). There were analysis and explanation of mixed interfering factors only in 5 papers (5.6%). There was no explanation of the evaluation of sample size in any one paper.

CONCLUSIONIn summary, the literature concerning clinical studies published in CJB in the past five years has become more extensive. However, the present study indicates that many clinical trials are not designed and ethical consideration is often missing. Therefore, it is deemed imperative to improve the quality of the clinical studies by improving the planning of the protocols of the study and statistical analysis of the research results in future.