Analysis of GRACE principle for comparative effectiveness research.
- Author:
Yan-ming XIE
1
;
Xing LIAO
Author Information
1. Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Comparative Effectiveness Research;
Research Design;
standards
- From:
Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine
2012;32(8):1121-1125
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Comparative effectiveness research (CER) now is a very popular concept in the field of international heath care reformation. Although its contents are not essentially changed, it advocates a new medical idea, a policy orientation at the national medical system level. The European countries and America hope CER could initiate the construction of a new historical milestone. Although there are already some guidelines for the design and report of CER by authorized international organizations, its assessment standards have not been involved. Therefore, good research for comparative effectiveness (GRACE) was signed by International Society Pharmacoepidemiology. A series of standard rules were formulated on how to assess the observational studies. In this article by analyzing the GRACE, we hope to provide the referential standards for enforcing observational studies by introducing CER in the clinical studies of Chinese medicine.
