Radiological characteristics and clinical manifestation of isolated lumbar foraminal stenosis.
- Author:
Xueming CHEN
1
;
Shiqing FENG
2
;
Hua GUAN
;
Zhenshan YU
;
Libin CUI
;
Yanhui WANG
;
Songjie XU
;
Xin YUAN
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Constriction, Pathologic; diagnostic imaging; Decompression, Surgical; Humans; Lumbar Vertebrae; surgery; Lumbosacral Region; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Spinal Fusion; Spinal Stenosis; diagnostic imaging; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- From: Chinese Journal of Surgery 2015;53(8):584-588
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo discuss radiological characteristics and clinical manifestation of isolated lumbar foraminal stenosis.
METHODSFrom March 2011 to March 2014, 21 patients with isolated degenerative lumbar foraminal stenosis accepted lumbar decompression and fusion in Beijing Luhe Hospital. Intervertebral disc space was evaluated by measuring the position of joint-body line on preoperative X-ray. Bilateral foraminal area of the corresponding segment in CT (sagittal view of 2D reconstruction) and MRI (T2W1 sagittal view) were measured by Surgimap software. For patients with unilateral symptoms, foraminal area of the affected side was compared with that of the contralateral side. Foraminal area of the same segment on CT was also compared with that on MRI. Preoperatively and at the final follow-up, visual analogue score (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to evaluate clinical outcomes.
RESULTSAll patients had a follow-up over 6 months and the average follow-up was 16.8 months (7-42 months). Of the 21 patients (26 segments), 12 segments showed gross narrowing and 14 segments showed slight narrowing. After preoperative measurement on MRI, 6 patients had foraminal stenosis of grade 2, and 15 patients had foraminal stenosis of grade 3, showing no significant difference in clinical outcomes. Compared with the foraminal area of the unaffected side, the affected side showed a decrease of 16% on CT and 28% on MRI, and the difference was statistically significant (t = 3.453, P < 0.05). The foraminal area measured on CT was larger than that measured on MRI (P < 0.05). Compared with that preoperatively, VAS (back pain), VAS (leg pain) and ODI showed significant improvement at the final follow-up (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONSRadiological examinations as X-ray, CT, MRI and intervertebral foramen block technique play an important role in the diagnosis of foraminal stenosis. Soft oppression caused by hyperplasia and hypertrophy of transforaminal ligment or joint capsule may be important promoters of degenerative lumbar foraminal stenosis. Lumbar foraminal decompression and interbody fusion can satisfactorily improve preoperative symptoms.