OBJECTIVETo investigate the effect of utilizing octreotide during perioperative period on pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

METHODSThree hundreds and six patients admitted from January 2010 to October 2014, who prepared to undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) were randomly divided into octreotide group (147 cases) and control group (159 cases). In octreotide group, octreotide was used in subcutaneous injection instantly after PD, each 8 hours until postoperative 10(th) day, and patients in control group were injected with the same volume of saline. Differences of pancreatic fistula (Grade A, Grade B, Grade C), hospitalization days and treatment cost were compared. χ(2) test, t-test and Fisher exact test were used to analyzed to the data, respectively.

RESULTSNo statistical significance (P>0.05) between two groups in the incidence of pancreatic fistula after PD (Grade A: 8.8% vs. 10.2%, Grade B: 2.7% vs. 4.4%, Grade C: 0.7% vs. 1.3%; χ(2)=0.197, 0.700, 0.288; P=0.657, 0.403, 0.591), the length of hospitalization((12.1±1.2)days vs. (13.0±1.2)days)(t=1.711, P=0.104) and treatment cost (79 700±6 700 vs. 77 600±5 200)(t=1.378, P=0.185). When accompanied with high risk factors, such as soft texture of pancreas, pancreatic duct size less than 3 mm, BMI≥25 kg/m(2) and diabetes, compared with control group, octreotide group had the lower incidence rate of pancreatic fistula and clinical correlative pancreatic fistula(all P<0.05) after PD.

CONCLUSIONSGenerally, octreotide makes no contribution to reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistula after PD. However, for patients who is accompanied with high risk factors, such as soft texture of pancreas, pancreatic duct size less than 3 mm, BMI≥25 kg/m(2) and diabetes, octreotide can effectively prevent pancreatic fistula after PD.