Docetaxel plus carboplatin versus EC-T as adjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer: safety data from a phase III randomized open-label trial.
- Author:
Peng YUAN
1
;
Bing-he XU
;
Jia-yu WANG
;
Fei MA
;
Qing LI
;
Pin ZHANG
;
Ying FAN
;
Qiao LI
;
Wen-miao WANG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Adult; Aged; Alopecia; chemically induced; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; adverse effects; therapeutic use; Breast Neoplasms; drug therapy; metabolism; pathology; radiotherapy; surgery; Carboplatin; administration & dosage; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast; drug therapy; metabolism; pathology; radiotherapy; surgery; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Cyclophosphamide; administration & dosage; Epirubicin; administration & dosage; Female; Humans; Leukopenia; chemically induced; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Neutropenia; chemically induced; Premenopause; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant; Receptor, ErbB-2; metabolism; Receptors, Estrogen; metabolism; Receptors, Progesterone; metabolism; Taxoids; administration & dosage; Vomiting; chemically induced
- From: Chinese Journal of Oncology 2012;34(6):465-468
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETriple-negative [estrogen receptor (ER)-/progesterone receptor (PR)-/HER2-] breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for ∼ 15% of overall breast cancer and associated with a poor prognosis. There is a short of standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for TNBC. A number of studies have shown that TNBC might be sensitive to cisplatin and carboplatin on the basis that dysfunction of BRCA1 and its pathway is associated with a specific DNA-repair defect, but data of adjuvant setting about this is limited.
METHODSFrom January 2010 to September 2011, 95 early triple-negative breast cancer patients confirmed by pathology were randomly assigned to receive TP (docetaxel 75 mg/m², carboplatin AUC = 5, day 1, 21 days a cycle for 6 cycles) or EC-T (epirubicin 90 mg/m², cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m², d1, 21 days a cycle for 4 cycles, followed by docetaxel 80 mg/m², d1, 21 days a cycle for 4 cycles) chemotherapy. Adjuvant radiation therapy was given selectively after chemotherapy. Here we report a preliminary safety analysis with the chi-square test.
RESULTSSeventy-six out of the 95 patients had completed the chemotherapy and could be assessed for the safety profiles of the regimens. Thirty-seven of them were in the EC-T group with a median age of 47 years, and 21 out of these 37 patients were premenopausal (56.8%). Another 39 patients came from the TP group with a median age of 46 years, and 22 out of these 39 patients were premenopausal (56.4%). All of the 37 patients in EC-T group completed the planned treatment whereas 2 patients of the 39 cases in TP group did not because of bone marrow suppression. During the treatments, 9 patients had dose adjustment in each group. Adverse events of grade 1/2 were common. Specific incidence of adverse events with grade 3/4 in each group was as follows: alopecia, 29.7% vs. 10.3% (P = 0.033), vomiting 21.6% vs. 7.7% (P = 0.085), leukopenia 54.1% vs.25.6% (P = 0.011) and neutropenia 51.4% vs. 35.9% (P = 0.174). Other grade 3/4 toxicities were rare. All the adverse events (except peripheral neuropathy and pigmentation) recovered within 1 month after the chemotherapy.
CONCLUSIONBoth EC-T and TP regimens as adjuvant chemotherapy are safe and tolerable for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer patients, while the TP regimen has advantages with less grade III/IV alopecia and leukopenia.