Reperfusion arrhythmias in acute myocardial infarction do not enhance myocardial injury.
- Author:
Yi LUO
1
;
Guang-lian LI
;
Yi-zhi PAN
;
Chong ZENG
;
Xiao-ming LEI
;
Zhen LIU
;
Kai-Wei FENG
;
Yao-qiu PI
;
Lei LÜ
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Arrhythmias, Cardiac; complications; Cell Survival; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; therapy; Myocardial Reperfusion; Myocardial Reperfusion Injury; etiology; Myocardium; enzymology; Retrospective Studies
- From: Chinese Journal of Cardiology 2007;35(2):164-167
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo investigate the clinical implications of reperfusion arrhythmias during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
METHODSData from 228 AMI patients in whom the infarct-related artery (IRA) were successfully recanalized by primary PCI were retrospectively analyzed. The 228 patients were divided into 2 groups: myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MIRI) group (n=119) in whom MIRI events occurred within minutes after successful recanalization of IRA, and non-MIRI group (n=109). The 119 patients in MIRI group were further divided into 3 subgroups: severe bradycardia with hypotension (brady-arrhythmia subgroup), lethal ventricular arrhythmias requiring electrical cardioversion (tachy-arrhythmia subgroup), and IRA antegrade flow less than or equal to TIMI 2 grade without angiographic evidence of abrupt closure (no-reflow subgroup).
RESULTS(1) Clinical and angiographic data: Compared with non-MIRI group, MIRI group was characterized by more inferior infarct location, shorter ischemic duration, more frequently right coronary artery as IRA, more diseased vessels, more often TIMI 0 grade of initial antegrade flow in IRA, less pre-infarction angina, more renal insufficiency, and higher in-hospital mortality (13.4% vs. 4.6%, P=0.021). (2) The peak CK level was remarkably lower in brady-arrhythmia subgroup than that in non-MIRI group (2010 IU/L vs. 2521 IU/L, P=0.039). The peak CK or CK-MB level was notably higher in no-reflow subgroup than in non-MIRI group (4573 IU/L, 338 IU/L, respectively, P=0.000). (3) Left ventricular ejection fraction in no-reflow subgroup was significantly lower than in non-MIRI group (38.7% +/- 8.3% vs. 51.2% +/- 8.1%, P=0.000), left ventricular end-diastolic volume in no-reflow subgroup was greater than that in tachy-arrhythmia subgroup [(135 +/- 32) ml vs. (105 +/- 19) ml, P=0.029].
CONCLUSIONReperfusion arrhythmias may imply the existence of much survived myocardium and do not enhance myocardial damage, while no-reflow increases myocardial injury and induces permanent impairment of cardiac function.