Distal fixation prosthesis for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients: a mid-term follow-up study.
- Author:
Zhan-feng ZHANG
;
Ji-kang MIN
;
Jian-ming ZHONG
;
Dan WANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Female; Femur; surgery; Follow-Up Studies; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary; Hip Fractures; surgery; Hip Joint; surgery; Hip Prosthesis; Humans; Male; Treatment Outcome
- From: China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2016;29(6):491-495
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo explore mid-term follow up results of distal fixation prosthesis in treating unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients.
METHODSFrom May 2008 to March 2014,58 elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric were treated with distal fixation prosthesis, among them, there were 15 males and 43 females aged from 75 to 87 years old with an average of 83.2 years old. Fracture were classified according to Evans classification, 39 cases were type I c and 19 cases were type I d. Surgical risk was evaluated before operation, 9 patients were performed total hip arthroplasty and 49 patients were performed prosthetic replacement hip joint function of patients with different age period, Evans classificaton, prothesis type, fixation method were evaluated respectively by using Harris score.
RESULTSFifty-six patients were followed up from 13 to 36 months with an average of 21.6 months. Harris score was 83.51 ± 6.40, 5 cases got excellent results, 38 cases good and 13 cases moderate. Harris score of patients aged from 75 to 80 years old was 88.64 ± 2.35, 81.64 ± 6.40 in patients aged more than 80 years old, and had significant differences between two groups; Harris score in patients with type Evans I c was 83.64 ± 6.53, and 83.11 ± 6.08 in type Evans I d, while there was no significant differences between two groups. There was no obvious meaning in Harris score between patients with tension band (83.63 ± 6.15) and without tension band (82.41 ± 6.57). There was no significant meaning in Harris score between patients with normal distal fixation prosthesis (83.34 ± 6.43) and femoral moment reconstruction distal fixation prosthesis (83.92 ± 6.51). There was 1 patient occurred hip joint dislocation on the operative side and re-dislocation after manual reduction, then received open reduction. Two patients occurred femoral osteolysis without clinical symptoms, and treated conservative treatment.
CONCLUSIONArtificial joint replacement for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients, hip joint function in patients aged more than 80 years old is worse, while there was no obvious market effect in fracture classification, whether to use tension band and type of distal fixation prosthesis, moreover, proximal femoral osteolysis should be focused on.