Comparative Study of Complete and Partial Omentectomy in Radical Subtotal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer.
10.3349/ymj.2011.52.6.961
- Author:
Min Chan KIM
1
;
Ki Han KIM
;
Ghap Joong JUNG
;
David W RATTNER
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea. mckim@donga.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Keywords:
Partial omentectomy;
gastric cancer;
post-operative outcome;
comparative study
- MeSH:
Aged;
Female;
Gastrectomy/*methods;
Humans;
Laparoscopy/*methods;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Omentum/*surgery;
Retrospective Studies;
Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis/*surgery;
Treatment Outcome
- From:Yonsei Medical Journal
2011;52(6):961-966
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Curative surgery for patients with advanced or even early gastric cancer can be defined as resection of the stomach and dissection of the first and second level lymph nodes, including the greater omentum. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long- term outcomes of partial omentectomy (PO) as compared with complete omentectomy (CO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen consecutive open distal gastrectomies with POs were initially performed between February and July in 2006. The patients' clinicopathologic data and post-operative outcomes were retrospectively compared with 20 patients who underwent open distal gastrectomies with COs for early gastric cancer in 2005. RESULTS: The operation time in PO group was significantly shorter than that in CO group (142.4 minutes vs. 165.0 minutes, p=0.018). The serum albumin concentration on the first post-operative day in PO group was significantly higher than CO group (3.8 g/dL vs. 3.5 g/dL, p=0.018). Three postoperative minor complications were successfully managed with conservative treatment. Median follow-up period between PO and CO was 38.1 and 37.7 months. All patients were alive without recurrence until December 30, 2009. CONCLUSION: PO during open radical distal gastrectomy can be considered a more useful procedure than CO for treating early gastric cancer. To document the long-term technical and oncologic safety of this procedure, a large-scale prospective randomized trial will be needed.
