Effect of Septoplasty on Voice Quality: A Prospective-Controlled Trial.
- Author:
Safak GULEC
1
;
Ismail KULAHLI
;
Mehmet Ilhan SAHIN
;
Kerem KOKOĞLU
;
Murat Salih GUNES
;
Deniz AVCI
;
Turan ARLI
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Nasal Septum; Voice Quality; Rhinomanometry
- MeSH: Humans; Nasal Cavity; Nasal Septum; Rhinomanometry; Voice Quality*; Voice*
- From:Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology 2016;9(3):238-243
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The purpose is to investigate effect of septoplasty and widened nasal patency on voice quality. METHODS: Fifty patients who undergone septoplasty were included in the study. Thirty-three people who had similar age and distribution were enrolled as control group. Before and 1 and 3 months after surgery, anterior rhinomanometry, voice analysis by Multi-Dimensional Voice Program, and spectrographic analysis were performed to patients. The recordings of /a/ vowel were used to evaluate average fundamental frequency (F0), jitter percent, and shimmer percent. In spectrographic analyses, F3–F4 values for the vowels /i, e, a, o, and u/, nasal formant frequencies of the consonants /m/ and /n/ in the word /mini/, and 4 formant frequencies (F1, F2, F3, and F4) for nasalized /i/ vowel following a nasal consonant /n/ in the word /mini/ were compared. The differences in nasal resonance were evaluated. All patients were asked whether change in their voices after the surgery. Preoperative and postoperative voice parameters and anterior rhinomanometry results were compared separately with the control group as well as in the patient group itself. RESULTS: Preoperative total nasal resistance (TNR) values of patients were higher than the control group (P=0.001). TNR values of patients measured one day before surgery and after surgery in the 1st and 3rd months were different and these differences were significant statistically (P=0.001). There was no significant difference between the voice analysis parameters in preoperative, postoperative 1st, and 3rd months. As a result of their subjective reviews, 12 patients (36%) noted their voices were better than before surgery and 20 patients (61%) noted no change before and after surgery. CONCLUSION: Providing widened nasal cavity has no effect on voice quality.
