Percutaneous intervertebral foramina endoscopic lumbar discectomy decompression for elder patients with lumbar spinal stenosis syndrome.
- Author:
De-Xin HU
;
Qi ZHENG
;
Bo ZHU
;
Xiao-Zhang YING
;
Yi-Fan WANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Decompression, Surgical; Diskectomy, Percutaneous; Endoscopy; Female; Humans; Lumbar Vertebrae; surgery; Male; Spinal Stenosis; surgery; Treatment Outcome
- From: China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2014;27(3):194-198
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the clinical outcomes of percutaneous intervertebral foramina endoscopic lumbar discectomy for elder patients with lumbar spinal stenosis syndrome.
METHODSFrom July 2006 to July 2011, 60 elder patients with lumbar spinal stenosis syndrome were treated with surgical operation, including 32 males and 28 females with an average age of (66.7 +/- 2.5) years old ranging from 72 to 83 years. These patients were divided into the traditional surgery group and percutaneous intervertebral foramina endoscopic discectomy groups (PTED group), 30 cases in each group. The index of the preoperative and postoperative, operative incision visual analogue scale (VAS) of two groups were compared. The Oswestry disability index (ODI) of two groups at 6, 24 months of the follow-up were also evaluated on activity of daily living.
RESULTSThe average operative time, the average blood loss, the number of cases using analgesic drug, hospitalization time of PTED group were better than those of the traditional surgery group (P < 0.05). The improvement of incision VAS in PTED group was better than that in the traditional surgery group (P < 0.05). All patients were followed up for 24 months at least. The ODI at 1, 24 month after operation were better than that of preoperative in two group respectively (P < 0.05), but the improvement of PTED group was better than that of the traditional surgery group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONPTED has the advantages of smaller incision, less bleeding, less postoperative stay and hospitalization time, tissue trauma and quicker recovery. It is a safe and efficacious minimally invasive surgical technique for elder patients with lumbar spinal stenosis syndrome.