A novel, minimally-invasive technique of cartilage repair in the human knee using arthroscopic microfracture and injections of mesenchymal stem cells and hyaluronic acid--a prospective comparative study on safety and short-term efficacy.
- Author:
Kevin B L LEE
1
;
Victor T Z WANG
;
Yiong Huak CHAN
;
James H P HUI
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Adult; Arthroscopy; methods; Cartilage, Articular; injuries; Combined Modality Therapy; methods; Female; Humans; Hyaluronic Acid; therapeutic use; Knee Injuries; therapy; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation; methods; Outcome Assessment (Health Care); Patient Safety; Prospective Studies; Singapore; Viscosupplements; therapeutic use
- From:Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2012;41(11):511-517
- CountrySingapore
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
INTRODUCTIONMost current cell-based cartilage repair techniques require some form of scaffolds and 2 separate surgical procedures. We propose a novel, scaffold-less technique of cartilage repair in the human knee that combines arthroscopic microfracture and outpatient intra-articular injections of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and hyaluronic acid (HA).
MATERIALS AND METHODSSeventy matched (age, sex, lesion size) knees with symptomatic cartilage defects underwent cartilage repair with the proposed technique (n = 35) or an open technique (n = 35) in which the MSCs were implanted beneath a sutured periosteal patch over the defect. Prospective evaluation of both groups were performed using the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) Cartilage Injury Evaluation Package, which included questions from the Short-Form (SF-36) Health Survey, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form, Lysholm knee scale, and Tegner activity level scale. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation was also performed at 1 year for most patients.
RESULTSThere were no clinically significant adverse events reported through the course of our study. At the fi nal follow-up (mean = 24.5 months), there was significant improvement in mean IKDC, Lysholm, SF-36 physical component score and visual analogue pain scores in both treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONIn the short term, the results of this novel technique are comparable to the open procedure with the added advantages of being minimally invasive and requiring only a single operation under general anaesthesia. Its safety has been validated and its efficacy is currently being evaluated in an ongoing randomised controlled trial.