MRI findings of uterine cervical cancer and value of MRI in preoperative staging.
- Author:
Xin-chun LI
1
;
Jiang-biao SHANG
;
Xiao-mei WU
;
Qing-si ZENG
;
Chong-peng SUN
;
Jiang-xun HE
;
Zhi-wei ZHONG
;
Zheng-song CHEN
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Adult; Aged; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; pathology; surgery; Female; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; methods; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Neoplasm Staging; methods; Preoperative Care; Reproducibility of Results; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; pathology; surgery
- From: Journal of Southern Medical University 2007;27(3):352-354
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosis and preoperative staging of uterine cervical cancer.
METHODSMRI findings and staging in 72 patients with cervical carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed, and the size, location, signal intensity and invasion of the tumor were observed. MRI sequence included SE T1WI, (TSE)T2WI, T2WI/SPIR and contrast-enhanced T1WI.
RESULTSMRI identified uterus cervical cancer in all cases with the exception of only 1 case of IA stage. The tumor was represented by hypointensity and isointensity on T1WI, heterogeneous and homogeneous hyperintensity on T2WI, mildly heterogeneous enhancement after bolus intravenous GD-DTPA injection. MRI had an accuracy of 86% in localization of the tumor, but its accuracy in clinical staging was only 64% (chi2=6.453, P<0.05). The tumor volume measured by MRI was similar with that by pathological measurement (1.94-/+1.15 vs 1.94-/+1.11, P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONMRI can accurately describe the size and invasion of uterine cervical cancer, especially useful in detecting parametrial invasion, but for diagnosis of IA uterine cervical cancer, MRI findings are not sufficient without considerations of clinical findings and cellular examination.
