Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in 20 Patients with Urinary Stone of Solitary Kidney.
- Author:
Chung Hwan OH
1
;
Young Tae MOON
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
ESWL;
urinary stone;
solitary kidney;
EDAP-LT01
- MeSH:
Anesthesia;
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell;
Female;
Hospitalization;
Humans;
Kidney Pelvis;
Kidney*;
Lithotripsy*;
Male;
Nephrectomy;
Sex Ratio;
Shock*;
Stents;
Ureter;
Urinary Calculi*
- From:Korean Journal of Urology
1990;31(1):80-87
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
EDAP-LT01 ESWL underwent 71 treatments in 20 patients with urinary stone of solitary kidney between February 25, 1987 and August 18, 1988. 1. The sex ratio was about 2:1, 13(65.0%) in male and 7(35.0%) in female patients. The average patient age was 50 years with a range of 23 to 65 years. The previous nephrectomy was owing to urinary tract stone in 19(95.0% ) and transitional cell carcinoma of renal pelvis in 1 (5.0%). 2. The duration of hospitalization was required from 2 to 7 days and the average post-ESWL stay was 1.5 days. 3. The treated stone locations were kidney in 18(90.0% ) ;calyx in 12(60.0% ) and renal pelvis in 6(30.0%) and ureter in 2(10.0%) ;upper ureter in 1(5.0% ) and lower ureter in 1(5.0%) There were multiple renal stones in 4(20.0% ).The average stone size was 1.6cm with a range of 0.7 to 4.1cm. 4. The average numbers of treatrnent were 2.7 sessions and the average treatment time was 30.2 minutes with a range of 17 to 42 minutes. The average storage was required 180 in one session. Of the patients, 4(20.0% ) were complained severe pain but treatment interruption or anesthesia were not required. 5. The success rate among 11 patients who completed ESWL treatment were 100.0% in 0.7-1.0cm, 60.0% in 1.0-2.0cm, 100.0% in 2.0-3.0cm and 77.8% in calyceal stones, 100.0% in renal pelvis stones. 100.0% in lower ureteral stones. Thus, the total average success rate was 81.8 %. 6. The method of pre-ESWL additional manipulation was used a upper ureteral stone 'push-up' in 1(5.0%). The post-ESWL additional measures were made in 4(20.0 % ) ;'push-up' & double -J stenting in 1(5.0% ) and double-J stenting in 3(15.0% ). The causes of failed ESWL were impacted stone in 1 and 'push-up' failure in 1. 7. None of the patients had significant changes in renal function by shock waves. ESWL complications were not required admission and medical management. Therefore, we confirmed that EDAP-LTOI piezoelectric ESWL is not influenced on renal function and is a safe, effective method for treatment of urinary stones in patients with a solitary kidney.
