Macro-shear bond strength and micro-shear bond strength of ceromer bonded to metal alloy and fiber reinforced composite.
- Author:
Hyung Yoon PARK
1
;
Lee Ra CHO
;
Kyung Mo CHO
;
Chan Jin PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry and Research Institute of Oral Science, Kangnung National University, Korea. doctorcj@kangnung.ac.kr
- Publication Type:In Vitro ; Original Article
- Keywords:
Macro-shear bond strength;
Micro-shear bond strength;
Ceromer;
Fiber-reinforced composite
- MeSH:
Adhesives;
Alloys*;
Crowns;
Fungi;
Gold Alloys;
Metals;
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning;
Nerve Fibers, Myelinated;
Polymers;
Shear Strength
- From:The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2004;42(6):654-663
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: According to the fracture pattern in several reports, fractures most frequently occur in the interface between the ceromer and the substructure. PURPOSE: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the macro shear bond strength and microshear bond strength of a ceromer bonded to a fiber reinforced composite (FRC) as well as metal alloys. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten of the following substructures, type II gold alloy, Co-Cr alloy, Ni-Cr alloy, and FRC (Vectris) substructures with a 12 mm in diameter, were imbedded in acrylic resin and ground with 400, and 1, 000-grit sandpaper. The metal primer and wetting agent were applied to the sandblasted bonding area of the metal specimens and the FRC specimens, respectively. The ceromer was placed onto a 6 mm diameter and 3 mm height mold in the macro-shear test and 1 mm diameter and 2 mm height mold in the micro-shear test, and then polymerized. The macro- and micro-shear bond strength were measured using a universal testing machine and a micro-shear tester, respectively. The macro- and micro-shear strength were analyzed with ANOVA and a post-hoc Scheffe adjustment (alpha= .05). The fracture surfaces of the crowns were then examined by scanning electron microscopy to determine the mode of failure. Chi-square test was used to identify the differences in the failure mode. RESULTS: The macro-shear strength and the micro-shear strength differed significantly with the types of substructure (P< .001). Although the ceromer/FRC group showed the highest macro and micro-shear strength, the micro-shear strength was not significantly different from that of the base metal alloy groups. The base metal alloy substructure groups showed the lowest mean macro-shear strength. However, the gold alloy substructure group exhibited the least micro-shear strength. The micro-shear strength was higher than the macro-shear strength excluding the gold alloy substructure group. Adhesive failure was most frequent type of fracture in the ceromer specimens bonded to the gold alloys. Cohesive failure at the ceromer layer was more common in the base metals and FRC substructures. CONCLUSION: The Vectris substructure had higher shear strength than the other substructures. Although the shear strength of the ceromer bonded to the base metals was lower than that of the gold alloy, the micro-shear strength of the base metals were superior to that of the gold alloy.
