Comparision of Osseointegration Depending on Surface Treatment.
10.5051/jkape.2004.34.4.699
- Author:
Ha Jun HWANG
1
;
Joon Bong PARK
;
Young Hyuk KWON
;
Yeek HERR
Author Information
1. Department of Periodontology, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea. jbpark@khu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
surface-treated implant;
pure titanium machined surface acid treated surface;
Al2O3(50~100micrometer) blasted with acid treated surface
- MeSH:
Animals;
Bicuspid;
Dogs;
Humans;
Male;
Osseointegration*;
Titanium
- From:The Journal of the Korean Academy of Periodontology
2004;34(4):699-709
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
The present study was performed to evaluate histomorphological difference in various surface-treated implants in beagle. Implants(Implantium(R), Dentium Co. Korea) with pure titanium machined surface, acid treated surface, and Al2O3(50~100micrometer)blasted with acid treated surface were used in this study. All mandibular premolars of 1.5~2 year old male beagle dogs were extracted. At 3 months after extraction, the implants(phi 4mm, l6mm) were installed. The beagle were sacrificed at 1, 3 months after installation and then tissues including implants were prepared for non-decalcified specimens. These specimens were analyzed comparatively under light microscope. The results of this study were as follow 1. Higher rate of osseointegration were showed in the Al2O3(50~100micrometer)blasted with acid-treated surface. 2. Increased osseointegration were showed in the Al2O3(50~100micrometer)blasted with acidtreated surface with time. 3. Higher maturation of integration were showed in the Al2O3(50~100micrometer)blasted with acid-treated surface. In conclusion, surface treatment of Al2O3blasted with acid might be considered to shorten healing time and improve success rate as increasing contact of implant and bone.
