A review of 111 anaesthetic patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.
- Author:
Sze Ying THONG
1
;
Claramae Shulyn CHIA
2
;
Oriana NG
1
;
Grace TAN
2
;
Ee Teng ONG
1
;
Khee Chee SOO
2
;
Melissa TEO
2
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: anaesthesia; cytoreductive surgery; intraperitoneal chemotherapy
- From:Singapore medical journal 2017;58(8):488-496
- CountrySingapore
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
INTRODUCTIONCytoreductive surgery (CRS) along with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the treatment of choice for selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, a previously lethal condition with dismal survival rates.
METHODSWe reviewed CRS and HIPEC procedures performed at our centre from January 1997 to December 2012, focusing on perioperative events and anaesthetic implications.
RESULTSIn total, 111 patients underwent 113 procedures. Mean age of the patients was 51.7 (range 14-74) years and 84.1% were women. Mean duration of surgery was 9 hours 10 minutes ± 2 hours 56 minutes. Most tumours were ovarian or colorectal in origin, and the mean peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score was 14.3 ± 8.9. Mean estimated blood loss was 1,481 ± 1,064 mL. Mean total intravenous fluids and blood products administered was 8,498 ± 3,941 mL. Postoperatively, 79.5% of the patients needed intensive care, as 75.2% of the 113 procedures required interval extubation. Patients with lower PCI scores were more likely to be extubated immediately after surgery (p < 0.05). 80.0% of patients had coagulopathy postoperatively, and this was associated with longer HIPEC duration (p < 0.05). Median lengths of intensive care unit and hospital stays were two days and 14 days, respectively. Longer duration of surgery significantly correlated with longer hospitalisation. Prolonged hospitalisation was due to nosocomial pneumonia, pleural effusions, respiratory failure, sepsis, surgical complications (such as anastomotic or wound dehiscence), and intra-abdominal infections.
CONCLUSIONThe CRS and HIPEC technique is a major surgery with significant morbidity, as highlighted by the perioperative concerns observed in our study.