Role of probucol in preventing contrast induced acute kidney injury after coronary interventional procedure: a randomized trial
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2009.05.001
- VernacularTitle:普罗布考预防对比剂肾损害的随机化临床研究
- Author:
Li YIN
1
;
Guang-Ping LI
;
Tong LIU
;
Hong-Mei LIU
;
Xin CHEN
;
Mei HE
;
Xin-Tian ZHENG
;
En-Zhao LIU
;
Li-Juan ZHOU
Author Information
1. 天津医科大学第二医院
- Keywords:
Probucol;
Contrast media;
Kidney failure,acute
- From:
Chinese Journal of Cardiology
2009;37(5):385-388
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective Contrast induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI) is a significant clinical problem. We, therefore, performed a prospective, randomized trial to investigate the role of probueol in the prevention of CIAKI in patients with unstable angina pectoris (UAP) undergoing percutaneous coronary angiography (CAG) and interventions (PCI). Methods We studied 205 patients with UAP, who underwent CAG or PCI prospectively. Patients were randomly assigned to probucol group (n = 102) and control group (n= 103). In the probucol group, the patients received probucol tablets 500 mg b. i. d for 3 days before and after intervcntion. All the patients, after intervention, underwent hydration with intravenous saline at a rate of 1 ml per kilogram of body weight per hour for 12 hours. Results Patients were well-matched with no significant differenced at baseline in majority measured parameters between two groups. CIAKI occurred in 23 of the 205 (11.22%) patients. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify correlates of CIAKI and clinical data. CIAKI was most strongly associated with Scr≥132.6 μmol/L (OR =21.11,95% CI 1.95-56. 06, P＜0.001), Ccr ＜60 ml/min (OR =4.19, 95%(2/1.94-9.05, P ＜0.001), heart function ＞ class Ⅱ (OR = 6.23, 95% CI 2.73-14.21, P ＜ 0.001), Diabetes (OR = 2.049, 95% CI1.19-5.25, P ＜ 0.001), age ≥ 70 yrs (OR = 3.52, 95% CI 1.66-7.43, P ＜ 0.001), coronary artery calcification shown by CAG (OR =4.29, 95% CI 1.99-9.24, P ＜ 0.001). The rate of CIAKI in probueol groups was slightly lower compared with control group (7.84% vs. 14.56%), without significant difference. The post-procedure mean peak of Scr [(101.62±42. 98) μmol/L vs. (117.67 ～68.77) μmol/L, P =0.047] and the post-procedure increasing Ser from baseline (ASer) [(13.49 ± 19. 61) μmoL/L vs.(22.50 ± 18.31) μmol/L, P =0.001] in the probucol group decreased significantly compared with that of control group. Conclusion Prophylactic treatment with probueol 500 mg b. i. d during periproeedural stage in patients with UAP has preventing role against CIAK1 after cardiac catheterization.
