OBJECTIVETo study the clinical features, pathologic findings and prognosis of patients with dysplastic nodules of liver (DN) and early hepatocellular carcinomas (eHCC).

METHODSOne hundred and forty-five archival cases previously diagnosed as DN or eHCC or well-differentiated HCC during the period from 2000 to 2009 were retrieved and reevaluated with the new diagnostic criteria by two experienced pathologists, according to International Consensus Group for Hepatocellular Neoplasia (ICGHN) 2008. Immunohistochemical study (EnVision method) for CD34, HSP70, glutamine synthetase, glypican 3 and Ki-67 was carried out. The original diagnosis and diagnosis after review were compared and correlated with the survival data of the patients, with statistical analysis.

RESULTSWith the new criteria, 16 cases were diagnosed as low-grade DN, 50 cases as high-grade DN, 72 cases as DN with microinvasion, 7 cases as advanced HCC. Slide review showed no diagnostic discrepancy in 112 cases (77.2%). Amongst the 33 (22.8%) underdiagnosed cases, there were 7 cases of advanced HCC initially diagnosed as DN or DN with microinvasion and 26 cases of eHCC initially diagnosed as high-grade DN. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the diagnosis of high-grade DN or early HCC carried no statistically significant difference in overall survival (P = 0.778, 0.677) or disease-free survival (P = 0.949, 0.700) in all patients and in patients with no history of HCC. The co-existence of advanced HCC in patients with DN or eHCC significantly correlated with overall survival (P = 0.004) but not with disease-free survival (P = 0.079).

CONCLUSIONSThe new diagnostic criteria by ICGHN 2008 are useful in delineating high-grade DN and eHCC. The overall survival and disease-free survival of patients with eHCC or high-grade DN undergoing hepatectomy show no statistically significant difference. Patients with DN or eHCC have better prognosis than patients with advanced HCC, though there is still a high risk of tumor recurrence.