Impact of multifactor intensive intervention on self management, risk factor control and outcome of post percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention patients.
- Author:
Ya-ping HE
1
;
Zhi-gang LU
;
Yong-wen GU
;
Jing-wei PAN
;
Mei-fang GAO
;
Meng WEI
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Aged; Causality; Coronary Disease; prevention & control; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Education as Topic; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
- From: Chinese Journal of Cardiology 2012;40(12):1037-1040
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo test the efficacy of multifactor intensive intervention for post percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention (post-PCI) outpatients on self management, risk factor control and outcome.
METHODSA total of 263 patients with coronary heart disease (CAD) discharged from our cardiac center were randomized into usual care (4 CAD lectures focusing on the 2(nd) CAD prevention and patients-oriented outpatient visit) and intensive intervention (4 CAD lectures focusing on the 2(nd) CAD prevention, CAD outpatient visit twice a month, monthly telephone instructions on risk factor control and optimal medication). Patients were followed for 12 months and 250 patients completed follow-up.
RESULTSThere were more patients achieved a LDL-C level of less than 2.6 mmol/L in intensive intervention group than in usual care group (71.2% vs. 48.3%, P < 0.01). The percentages of patients taking dietary control (55.3% vs. 26.2%, P < 0.01) and physical exercises (64.4% vs. 39.0%, P < 0.01), receiving beta-adrenergic receptor blocker (75.0% vs. 50.8%, P < 0.01) and statins (72.0% vs. 54.2%, P < 0.01) were significantly higher while cardiovascular event rate (5.9% vs. 0%, P = 0.005)was significantly lower in intensive intervention group than in usual care group.
CONCLUSIONMultifactor intensive intervention is helpful on improving the second prevention for post-PCI coronary heart disease patients.