- VernacularTitle:线粒体DNA3243A→G异质水平定量检测方法的建立及应用
- Author:
Xiaoqin ZHANG
1
;
Lin CHEN
;
Yu YANG
;
Chao ZHENG
;
Jingbin YAN
;
Zhaoning LU
;
Jianxin LYU
;
Wei LI
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Adolescent; Adult; Base Sequence; Child; DNA, Mitochondrial; genetics; Deafness; diagnosis; genetics; Diabetes Mellitus; diagnosis; genetics; Female; Genetic Testing; methods; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; methods; Humans; Male; Molecular Sequence Data; Pedigree; Point Mutation; Polymerase Chain Reaction; methods; Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length; Young Adult
- From: Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2014;31(4):438-443
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo develop a rapid, simple, cost-effective, accurate and sensitive method for quantitative detection of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) 3243A→G mutation in order to provide reference for selecting the best detection method under different conditions.
METHODSGenomic DNA was extracted from peripheral leucocytes of 17 individuals from a Wenzhou family featuring maternally inherited diabetes and deafness (MIDD). Heteroplasmic level of mtDNA 3243A→G mutation was determined respectively with polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RLFP), real time-amplification refractory mutation system-quantitative PCR (RT-ARMS-qPCR) and pyrosquencing. Eleven plasmids with various heteroplasmic levels of the 3243A→G mutation (ranging from 0 to 100%)were constructed as the standards. The reliability of above methods was compared by correlation coefficient based on observed and expected values.
RESULTSFor all three methods, measurement of the standards showed a linear correlation between the expected and detected values, i.e., PCR-RFLP (R(2)=0.828), RT-ARMS-qPCR (R(2)=0.998) and pyrosquencing (R(2)=0.997). For the MIDD family, it was consistent that there are 13 members carrying the A3243G mutation with different heteroplasmic levels. And there was no significant difference between the results by RT-ARMS-qPCR and pyrosquencing.
CONCLUSIONPCR-RFLP is not appropriate for the quantitative detection but could be used for early clinical screening. Both RT-ARMS-qPCR and pyrosquencing are suitable for the detection of low heteroplasmic level of A3243G mutation. Compared with pyrosquencing, RT-ARMS-qPCR is rapid, reliable and cost-effective, and is the best choice for detecting low mutation loads.