Prospective randomised study of intra-articular fractures of the distal radius: comparison between external fixation and plate fixation.
- Author:
Germaine G Q XU
1
;
Siew Pang CHAN
;
Mark Edward PUHAINDRAN
;
Winston Y C CHEW
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Adult; Bone Plates; Bone Screws; External Fixators; Female; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Radiography; Radius Fractures; diagnostic imaging; surgery; Range of Motion, Articular; Recovery of Function; Wrist Injuries; diagnostic imaging; surgery; Young Adult
- From:Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2009;38(7):600-606
- CountrySingapore
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
INTRODUCTIONIntra-articular fractures of the distal radius represent high energy, complex, unstable injuries and the optimal method of treatment remains controversial.
MATERIALS AND METHODSThe aim of the paper is to compare the outcomes of external fixation (EF) with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with plates and screw fixation in the treatment of intra-articular fractures of the distal radius. Thirty-five patients were enlisted from December 2003 to September 2005 after a failure of initial conservative treatment. The patients were randomised into EF or ORIF groups. The patients were followed-up at 1 week, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Clinical and radiological outcomes were measured. They were scored using the Green and O'Brien or the Gartland and Wertley score.
RESULTSOf the 35 patients, 5 defaulted the 6-month follow-up and were excluded. We found that the clinical and radiological outcomes for the 2 groups were not significantly different. Complication rates were also similar.
CONCLUSIONThere is no significant difference in the outcome of intra-articular distal radius fractures treated with either EF or ORIF.
